May 18, 2026
As LLM benchmarks saturate, the evaluation community has pursued two strategies to increase difficulty: escalating knowledge demands (GPQA, HLE) or removing knowledge entirely in favor of abstract reasoning (ARC-AGI). The first conflates memorization with capability; the second divorces reasoning from the practical contexts in which it matters. We take a different approach. The Grounded Integration Measure (GIM) is a benchmark of 820 original problems (615 public, 205 private) where difficulty comes from integration; individual problems require coordinating multiple cognitive operations (constraint satisfaction, state tracking, epistemic vigilance, audience calibration) over broadly accessible knowledge, so that reasoning stays grounded in realistic tasks without being gated on specialized expertise. Each problem is an original expert-authored composition, majority with rubric-decomposed scoring (median 6 independently judged criteria). A balanced public–private split provides built-in contamination diagnostic. We calibrate a continuous response 2-parameter logistic (2PL) IRT model over >200k prompt-response pairs across 28 models, producing robust ability estimates that correctly order test-configurations even when raw accuracy is distorted by errors or missing data, addressing a common challenge in benchmark reporting. Using this framework, we present a comprehensive leaderboard spanning 22 models and 47 test-configurations (unique model × thinking-level pairs), and conduct what is to our knowledge the most extensive published study of how test-time compute trades off against model capability on a fixed benchmark: 11 models swept across 35 test-configurations. We observe that within-family configuration choices, such as thinking budget and quantization, matter as much as model selection, and increasing thinking tokens has diminishing marginal returns. We release the evaluation framework, calibrated IRT parameters, and all public problems.
Written by
Rohit Patel
Alexandre Rezende
Steven McClain
Publisher
arXiv
June 05, 2026
Zeyu Yang, Qi Ma, Jason Chen, Anshumali Shrivastava
June 05, 2026
May 26, 2026
Josephine Raugel, Max Seitzer, Marc Szafraniec, Huy V. Vo, Jérémy Rapin, Patrick Labatut, Piotr Bojanowski, Valentin Wyart, Jean Remi King
May 26, 2026
May 20, 2026
Dongyan Lin, Phillip Rust, Angel Villar Corrales, Alvin W. M. Tan, Mahi Luthra, Charles-Eric Saint-James, Rashel Moritz, Sheila Krogh-Jespersen, Vanessa Stark, Surya Parimi, Jiayi Shen, Youssef Benchekroun, Yosuke Higuchi, Martin Gleize, Tom Fizycki, Nicolas Hamilakis, Manel Khentout, Sho Tsuji, Balázs Kégl, Juan Pino, Michael C. Frank, Emmanuel Dupoux
May 20, 2026
May 12, 2026
Jean Remi King, Corentin Bel, Linnea Evanson, Julien Gadonneix, Sophia Houhamdi, Jarod Levy, Josephine Raugel, Andrea Santos Revilla, Mingfang (Lucy) Zhang, Julie Bonnaire, Charlotte Caucheteux, Alexandre Défossez, Théo Desbordes, Pablo Diego-Simón, Shubh Khanna, Juliette Millet, Pierre Orhan, Saarang Panchavati, Antoine Ratouchniak, Alexis Thual, Teon Brooks, Katelyn Begany, Yohann Benchetrit, Marlene Careil, Hubert Jacob Banville, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Simon Dahan, Jérémy Rapin
May 12, 2026

Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models