May 18, 2026
As LLM benchmarks saturate, the evaluation community has pursued two strategies to increase difficulty: escalating knowledge demands (GPQA, HLE) or removing knowledge entirely in favor of abstract reasoning (ARC-AGI). The first conflates memorization with capability; the second divorces reasoning from the practical contexts in which it matters. We take a different approach. The Grounded Integration Measure (GIM) is a benchmark of 820 original problems (615 public, 205 private) where difficulty comes from integration; individual problems require coordinating multiple cognitive operations (constraint satisfaction, state tracking, epistemic vigilance, audience calibration) over broadly accessible knowledge, so that reasoning stays grounded in realistic tasks without being gated on specialized expertise. Each problem is an original expert-authored composition, majority with rubric-decomposed scoring (median 6 independently judged criteria). A balanced public–private split provides built-in contamination diagnostic. We calibrate a continuous response 2-parameter logistic (2PL) IRT model over >200k prompt-response pairs across 28 models, producing robust ability estimates that correctly order test-configurations even when raw accuracy is distorted by errors or missing data, addressing a common challenge in benchmark reporting. Using this framework, we present a comprehensive leaderboard spanning 22 models and 47 test-configurations (unique model × thinking-level pairs), and conduct what is to our knowledge the most extensive published study of how test-time compute trades off against model capability on a fixed benchmark: 11 models swept across 35 test-configurations. We observe that within-family configuration choices, such as thinking budget and quantization, matter as much as model selection, and increasing thinking tokens has diminishing marginal returns. We release the evaluation framework, calibrated IRT parameters, and all public problems.
Written by
Rohit Patel
Alexandre Rezende
Steven McClain
Publisher
arXiv
July 17, 2026
Zilin Xiao, Qi Ma, Jason Chen, Xintao Chen, Avinash Atreya, Hanjie Chen, Vicente Ordonez
July 17, 2026
July 13, 2026
Xiaodong Wang, Xuanyi Zhao, Pedro Rodriguez, Devendra Singh Sachan, Barlas Oguz, Seungwhan Moon, Shang-Wen Li, Gargi Ghosh, Xin Dong, Wen-Tau Yih
July 13, 2026
July 03, 2026
Sonia Joseph, Quentin Garrido, Randall Balestriero, Matthew Kowal, Thomas Fel, Shahab Bakhtiari, Blake Richards, Mike Rabbat
July 03, 2026
June 05, 2026
Zeyu Yang, Qi Ma, Jason Chen, Anshumali Shrivastava
June 05, 2026

Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models