August 1, 2021
Leaderboards are widely used in NLP and push the field forward. While leaderboards are a straightforward ranking of NLP models, this simplicity can mask nuances in evaluation items (examples) and subjects (NLP models). Rather than replace leaderboards, we advocate a re-imagining so that they better highlight if and where progress is made. Building on educational testing, we create a Bayesian leaderboard model where latent subject skill and latent item difficulty predict correct responses. Using this model, we analyze the ranking reliability of leaderboards. Afterwards, we show the model can guide what to annotate, identify annotation errors, detect overfitting, and identify informative examples. We conclude with recommendations for future benchmark tasks.
Publisher
ACL
Research Topics
Natural Language Processing
April 25, 2025
Rulin Shao, Qiao Rui, Varsha Kishore, Niklas Muennighoff, Victoria Lin, Daniela Rus, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low, Sewon Min, Scott Yih, Pang Wei Koh, Luke Zettlemoyer
April 25, 2025
April 17, 2025
Ansong Ni, Ruta Desai, Yang Li, Xinjie Lei, Dong Wang, Ramya Raghavendra, Gargi Ghosh, Daniel Li (FAIR), Asli Celikyilmaz
April 17, 2025
March 17, 2025
Zhaofeng Wu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Andrew Cohen, Yoon Kim, Asli Celikyilmaz, Marjan Ghazvininejad
March 17, 2025
February 06, 2025
Jarod Levy, Mingfang (Lucy) Zhang, Svetlana Pinet, Jérémy Rapin, Hubert Jacob Banville, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Jean Remi King
February 06, 2025
April 30, 2018
Yedid Hoshen, Lior Wolf
April 30, 2018
November 01, 2018
Yedid Hoshen, Lior Wolf
November 01, 2018
December 02, 2018
Sagie Benaim, Lior Wolf
December 02, 2018
June 30, 2019
Geng Ji, Dehua Cheng, Huazhong Ning, Changhe Yuan, Hanning Zhou, Liang Xiong, Erik B. Sudderth
June 30, 2019
Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models