October 13, 2026
AI systems are increasingly capable of producing machine-checked Lean proofs of advanced mathematical results. Real mathematical formalization, however, is not isolated theorem proving: it requires building the definitions and intermediate lemmas that connect a result to a formal library. Existing evaluations often provide isolated theorem statements in settings where much of this supporting theory is already available in Mathlib. We introduce AutoformBench, a benchmark of 341 Lean 4 formalization tasks drawn from 24 advanced mathematical sources. Lean-experienced mathematicians formalized and audited each target statement, leaving the corresponding Lean proof to the evaluated agent. Each problem is embedded in a broader mathematical development: agents receive the informal proof but must translate it into Lean while constructing the missing definitions, intermediate lemmas, and supporting infrastructure. We compare the performance of frontier models on these problems. We find a largely shared difficulty frontier: success depends less on mathematical domain than on models' ability to construct missing formal infrastructure. Data and code at https://github.com/facebookresearch/autoformbench.
Written by
Charles Arnal
Ahmad Rammal
Niket Patel
Fabian Gloeckle
Bartosz Piotrowski
Amaury Hayat
Julia Kempe
Remi Munos
Publisher
arXiv
Research Topics
October 19, 2026
Muse Glimmer team
October 19, 2026
July 13, 2026
Xiaodong Wang, Xuanyi Zhao, Pedro Rodriguez, Devendra Singh Sachan, Barlas Oguz, Seungwhan Moon, Shang-Wen Li, Gargi Ghosh, Xin Dong, Wen-Tau Yih
July 13, 2026
June 05, 2026
Zeyu Yang, Qi Ma, Jason Chen, Anshumali Shrivastava
June 05, 2026
May 27, 2026
Ahmad Rammal, Niket Patel, Amaury Hayat, Julia Kempe, Remi Munos, Charles Arnal, Vivien Cabannes
May 27, 2026
