August 11, 2013
Many online experiments exhibit dependence between users and items. For example, in online advertising, observations that have a user or an ad in common are likely to be associated. Because of this, even in experiments involving millions of subjects, the difference in mean outcomes between control and treatment conditions can have substantial variance. Previous theoretical and simulation results demonstrate that not accounting for this kind of dependence structure can result in confidence intervals that are too narrow, leading to inaccurate hypothesis tests.
We develop a framework for understanding how dependence affects uncertainty in user-item experiments and evaluate how bootstrap methods that account for differing levels of dependence perform in practice. We use three real datasets describing user behaviors on Facebook – user responses to ads, search results, and News Feed stories – to generate data for synthetic experiments in which there is no effect of the treatment on average by design. We then estimate empirical Type I error rates for each bootstrap method. Accounting for dependence within a single type of unit (i.e., within-user dependence) is often sufficient to get reasonable error rates. But when experiments have effects, as one might expect in the field, accounting for multiple units with a multiway bootstrap can be necessary to get close to the advertised Type I error rates. This work provides guidance to practitioners evaluating large-scale experiments, and highlights the importance of analysis of inferential methods for dependence structures common to online systems.
December 18, 2025
Tomáš Souček, Pierre Fernandez, Hady Elsahar, Sylvestre Rebuffi, Valeriu Lacatusu, Tuan Tran, Tom Sander, Alexandre Mourachko
December 18, 2025
November 19, 2025
Nicolas Carion, Laura Gustafson, Yuan-Ting Hu, Shoubhik Debnath, Ronghang Hu, Didac Suris Coll-Vinent, Chaitanya Ryali, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Haitham Khedr, Andrew Huang, Jie Lei, Tengyu Ma, Baishan Guo, Arpit Kalla, Markus Marks, Joseph Greer, Meng Wang, Peize Sun, Roman Rädle, Triantafyllos Afouras, Effrosyni Mavroudi, Katherine Xu, Tsung-Han Wu, Yu Zhou, Liliane Momeni, Rishi Hazra, Shuangrui Ding, Sagar Vaze, Francois Porcher, Feng Li, Siyuan Li, Aishwarya Kamath, Ho Kei Cheng, Piotr Dollar, Nikhila Ravi, Kate Saenko, Pengchuan Zhang, Christoph Feichtenhofer
November 19, 2025
November 18, 2025
Shalini Maiti *, Amar Budhiraja *, Bhavul Gauri, Gaurav Chaurasia, Anton Protopopov, Alexis Audran-Reiss, Michael Slater, Despoina Magka, Tatiana Shavrina, Roberta Raileanu, Yoram Bachrach, * Equal authorship
November 18, 2025
November 10, 2025
Omnilingual ASR team, Gil Keren, Artyom Kozhevnikov, Yen Meng, Christophe Ropers, Matthew Setzler, Skyler Wang, Ife Adebara, Michael Auli, Can Balioglu, Kevin Chan, Chierh Cheng, Joe Chuang, Caley Drooff, Mark Duppenthaler, Paul-Ambroise Duquenne, Alexander Erben, Cynthia Gao, Gabriel Mejia Gonzalez, Kehan Lyu, Sagar Miglani, Vineel Pratap, Kaushik Ram Sadagopan, Safiyyah Saleem, Arina Turkatenko, Albert Ventayol-Boada, Zheng-Xin Yong, Yu-An Chung, Jean Maillard, Rashel Moritz, Alexandre Mourachko, Mary Williamson, Shireen Yates
November 10, 2025
October 31, 2019
Peng-Jen Chen, Jiajun Shen, Matt Le, Vishrav Chaudhary, Ahmed El-Kishky, Guillaume Wenzek, Myle Ott, Marc’Aurelio Ranzato
October 31, 2019
October 27, 2019
Zhuoyuan Chen, Demi Guo, Tong Xiao, Saining Xie, Xinlei Chen, Haonan Yu, Jonathan Gray, Kavya Srinet, Haoqi Fan, Jerry Ma, Charles R. Qi, Shubham Tulsiani, Arthur Szlam, Larry Zitnick
October 27, 2019
April 25, 2020
Yilun Du, Joshua Meier, Jerry Ma, Rob Fergus, Alexander Rives
April 25, 2020
June 11, 2019
Yuandong Tian, Jerry Ma, Qucheng Gong, Shubho Sengupta, Zhuoyuan Chen, James Pinkerton, Larry Zitnick
June 11, 2019

Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models