May 03, 2019
In the quest to align deep learning with the sciences to address calls for rigor, safety, and interpretability in machine learning systems, this contribution identifies key missing pieces: the stages of hypothesis formulation and testing, as well as statistical and systematic uncertainty estimation -- core tenets of the scientific method. This position paper discusses the ways in which contemporary science is conducted in other domains and identifies potentially useful practices. We present a case study from physics and describe how this field has promoted rigor through specific methodological practices, and provide recommendations on how machine learning researchers can adopt these practices into the research ecosystem. We argue that both domain-driven experiments and application-agnostic questions of the inner workings of fundamental building blocks of machine learning models ought to be examined with the tools of the scientific method, to ensure we not only understand effect, but also begin to understand cause, which is the raison d'être of science.
Written by
Michela Paganini
Jessica Zosa Forde
Publisher
Debugging Machine Learning Models workshop at ICLR
Research Topics
May 14, 2025
Brandon M. Wood, Misko Dzamba, Xiang Fu, Meng Gao, Muhammed Shuaibi, Luis Barroso-Luque, Kareem Abdelmaqsoud, Vahe Gharakhanyan, John R. Kitchin, Daniel S. Levine, Kyle Michel, Anuroop Sriram, Taco Cohen, Abhishek Das, Ammar Rizvi, Sushree Jagriti Sahoo, Zachary W. Ulissi, C. Lawrence Zitnick
May 14, 2025
May 13, 2025
Marlène Careil, Yohann Benchetrit, Jean-Rémi King
May 13, 2025
April 25, 2025
Rulin Shao, Qiao Rui, Varsha Kishore, Niklas Muennighoff, Victoria Lin, Daniela Rus, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low, Sewon Min, Scott Yih, Pang Wei Koh, Luke Zettlemoyer
April 25, 2025
April 17, 2025
Ansong Ni, Ruta Desai, Yang Li, Xinjie Lei, Dong Wang, Ramya Raghavendra, Gargi Ghosh, Daniel Li (FAIR), Asli Celikyilmaz
April 17, 2025
Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models