July 09, 2019
Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have reached striking performance in many natural language processing tasks. This has renewed interest in whether these generic sequence processing devices are inducing genuine linguistic knowledge. Nearly all current analytical studies, however, initialize the RNNs with a vocabulary of known words, and feed them tokenized input during training. We present a multi-lingual study of the linguistic knowledge encoded in RNNs trained as character-level language models, on input data with word boundaries removed. These networks face a tougher and more cognitively realistic task, having to discover any useful linguistic unit from scratch based on input statistics. The results show that our "near tabula rasa" RNNs are mostly able to solve morphological, syntactic and semantic tasks that intuitively presuppose word-level knowledge, and indeed they learned, to some extent, to track word boundaries. Our study opens the door to speculations about the necessity of an explicit, rigid word lexicon in language learning and usage.
Written by
Marco Baroni
Michael Hahn
Publisher
TACL
April 17, 2025
Ansong Ni, Ruta Desai, Yang Li, Xinjie Lei, Dong Wang, Ramya Raghavendra, Gargi Ghosh, Daniel Li (FAIR), Asli Celikyilmaz
April 17, 2025
April 17, 2025
Paul McVay, Sergio Arnaud, Ada Martin, Arjun Majumdar, Krishna Murthy Jatavallabhula, Phillip Thomas, Ruslan Partsey, Daniel Dugas, Abha Gejji, Alexander Sax, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Mikael Henaff, Ayush Jain, Ang Cao, Ishita Prasad, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Mike Rabbat, Nicolas Ballas, Mido Assran, Oleksandr Maksymets, Aravind Rajeswaran, Franziska Meier
April 17, 2025
April 14, 2025
Yeongmin Kim, Sotiris Anagnostidis, Yuming Du, Edgar Schoenfeld, Jonas Kohler, Markos Georgopoulos, Albert Pumarola, Ali Thabet, Artsiom Sanakoyeu
April 14, 2025
March 25, 2025
Wassim (Wes) Bouaziz, El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Nicolas Usunier
March 25, 2025
Foundational models
Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models