October 25, 2019
Theory of mind, i.e., the ability to reason about intents and beliefs of agents is an important task in artificial intelligence and central to resolving ambiguous references in natural language dialogue. In this work, we revisit the evaluation of theory of mind through question answering. We show that current evaluation methods are flawed and that existing benchmark tasks can be solved without theory of mind due to dataset biases. Based on prior work, we propose an improved evaluation protocol and dataset in which we explicitly control for data regularities via a careful examination of the answer space. We show that state-of-the-art methods which are successful on existing benchmarks fail to solve theory-of-mind tasks in our proposed approach.
Publisher
EMNLP
Research Topics
May 06, 2026
Saarang Panchavati, Antoine Ratouchniak, Mingfang (Lucy) Zhang, Elisa Cascardi, Hubert Banville, Jarod Levy, Jean-Rémi King, Jérémy Rapin, Katelyn Begany, Marlene Careil, Simon Dahan, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Teon Brooks, Yohann Benchetrit
May 06, 2026
May 04, 2026
Sachin Mehta, Alisa Liu, Margaret Li, Artidoro Pagnoni, Gargi Ghosh, Luke Zettlemoyer, Mike Lewis, Srini Iyer, Tomasz Limisiewicz
May 04, 2026
April 16, 2026
Nicola Cancedda, Pontus Stenetorp, Alexis Audran-Reiss, Alisia Lupidi, Anton Protopopov, Bassel Al Omari, Carole-Jean Wu, Derek Dunfield, Despoina Magka, Edan Toledo, Hela Momand, Ishita Mediratta, Jakob Foerster, Jean-Christophe Gagnon-Audet, Karen Hambardzumyan, Kelvin Niu, Martin Josifoski, Michael Kuchnik, Michael Shvartsman, Nicolas Baldwin, Parth Pathak, Rishi Hazra, Tatiana Shavrina, Thomas Simon Foster, Yoram Bachrach
April 16, 2026
March 24, 2026
Jenny Zhang, Bingchen Zhao, Jakob Foerster, Sam Devlin, Tatiana Shavrina, Winnie Yang
March 24, 2026

Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models