October 25, 2019
Theory of mind, i.e., the ability to reason about intents and beliefs of agents is an important task in artificial intelligence and central to resolving ambiguous references in natural language dialogue. In this work, we revisit the evaluation of theory of mind through question answering. We show that current evaluation methods are flawed and that existing benchmark tasks can be solved without theory of mind due to dataset biases. Based on prior work, we propose an improved evaluation protocol and dataset in which we explicitly control for data regularities via a careful examination of the answer space. We show that state-of-the-art methods which are successful on existing benchmarks fail to solve theory-of-mind tasks in our proposed approach.
Publisher
EMNLP
Research Topics
July 23, 2024
Llama team
July 23, 2024
June 25, 2024
Elena Voita, Javier Ferrando Monsonis, Christoforos Nalmpantis
June 25, 2024
June 25, 2024
Min-Jae Hwang, Ilia Kulikov, Benjamin Peloquin, Hongyu Gong, Peng-Jen Chen, Ann Lee
June 25, 2024
June 14, 2024
Sheng-Chieh Lin, Akari Asai, Minghan Li, Barlas Oguz, Jimmy Lin, Scott Yih, Xilun Chen
June 14, 2024
Product experiences
Foundational models
Product experiences
Latest news
Foundational models