October 25, 2019
Theory of mind, i.e., the ability to reason about intents and beliefs of agents is an important task in artificial intelligence and central to resolving ambiguous references in natural language dialogue. In this work, we revisit the evaluation of theory of mind through question answering. We show that current evaluation methods are flawed and that existing benchmark tasks can be solved without theory of mind due to dataset biases. Based on prior work, we propose an improved evaluation protocol and dataset in which we explicitly control for data regularities via a careful examination of the answer space. We show that state-of-the-art methods which are successful on existing benchmarks fail to solve theory-of-mind tasks in our proposed approach.
Publisher
EMNLP
Research Topics
February 07, 2025
The Omnilingual MT Team, Pierre Andrews, Mikel Artetxe, Mariano Coria Meglioli, Marta R. Costa-jussa, Joe Chuang, David Dale, Cynthia Gao, Jean Maillard, Alexandre Mourachko, Christophe Ropers, Safiyyah Saleem, Eduardo Sánchez, Yiannis Tsiamas, Arina Turkatenko, Albert Ventayol, Shireen Yates
February 07, 2025
February 07, 2025
Andros Tjandra, Yi-Chiao Wu, Baishan Guo, John Hoffman, Brian Ellis, Apoorv Vyas, Bowen Shi, Sanyuan Chen, Matt Le, Nick Zacharov, Carleigh Wood, Ann Lee, Wei-Ning Hsu
February 07, 2025
February 06, 2025
Jarod Levy, Mingfang (Lucy) Zhang, Svetlana Pinet, Jérémy Rapin, Hubert Jacob Banville, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Jean Remi King
February 06, 2025
February 06, 2025
Mingfang (Lucy) Zhang, Jarod Levy, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Jérémy Rapin, F.-Xavier Alario, Pierre Bourdillon, Svetlana Pinet, Jean Remi King
February 06, 2025
Foundational models
Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models