February 28, 2023
Recent approaches in self-supervised learning of image representations can be categorized into different families of methods and, in particular, can be divided into contrastive and non-contrastive approaches. While differences between the two families have been thoroughly discussed to motivate new approaches, we focus more on the theoretical similarities between them. By designing contrastive and covariance based non-contrastive criteria that can be related algebraically and shown to be equivalent under limited assumptions, we show how close those families can be. We further study popular methods and introduce variations of them, allowing us to relate this theoretical result to current practices and show the influence (or lack thereof) of design choices on downstream performance. Motivated by our equivalence result, we investigate the low performance of SimCLR and show how it can match VICReg's with careful hyperparameter tuning, improving significantly over known baselines. We also challenge the popular assumption that non-contrastive methods need large output dimensions. Our theoretical and quantitative results suggest that the numerical gaps between contrastive and non-contrastive methods in certain regimes can be closed given better network design choices and hyperparameter tuning. The evidence shows that unifying different SOTA methods is an important direction to build a better understanding of self-supervised learning.
Publisher
ICLR
Research Topics
Core Machine Learning
July 21, 2024
Ouail Kitouni, Niklas Nolte, Samuel Pérez Díaz, Sokratis Trifinopoulos, Mike Williams
July 21, 2024
July 08, 2024
Antonio Orvieto, Lin Xiao
July 08, 2024
June 17, 2024
Heli Ben-Hamu, Omri Puny, Itai Gat, Brian Karrer, Uriel Singer, Yaron Lipman
June 17, 2024
June 17, 2024
Neta Shaul, Uriel Singer, Ricky Chen, Matt Le, Ali Thabet, Albert Pumarola, Yaron Lipman
June 17, 2024
Product experiences
Foundational models
Product experiences
Latest news
Foundational models