November 02, 2018
Lake and Baroni (2018) recently introduced the SCAN data set, which consists of simple commands paired with action sequences and is intended to test the strong generalization abilities of recurrent sequence-to-sequence models. Their initial experiments suggested that such models may fail because they lack the ability to extract systematic rules. Here, we take a closer look at SCAN and show that it does not always capture the kind of generalization that it was designed for. To mitigate this we propose a complementary dataset, which requires mapping actions back to the original commands, called NACS. We show that models that do well on SCAN do not necessarily do well on NACS, and that NACS exhibits properties more closely aligned with realistic usecases for sequence-to-sequence models.
Publisher
Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
Research Topics
September 05, 2024
Chunting Zhou, Lili Yu, Arun Babu, Kushal Tirumala, Michihiro Yasunaga, Leonid Shamis, Jacob Kahn, Luke Zettlemoyer, Omer Levy, Xuezhe Ma
September 05, 2024
August 20, 2024
Ashish Shenoy, Yichao Lu, Srihari Jayakumar, Debojeet Chatterjee, Mohsen Moslehpour, Pierce Chuang, Abhay Harpale, Vikas Bhardwaj, Di Xu (SWE), Shicong Zhao, Ankit Ramchandani, Luna Dong, Anuj Kumar
August 20, 2024
August 11, 2024
Igor Tufanov, Karen Hambardzumyan, Javier Ferrando, Lena Voita
August 11, 2024
August 11, 2024
Marta R. Costa-jussa, Mariano Coria Meglioli, Pierre Andrews, David Dale, Kae Hansanti, Elahe Kalbassi, Christophe Ropers, Carleigh Wood
August 11, 2024
Foundational models
Latest news
Foundational models