December 12, 2024
As the use of text-to-image generative models increases, so does the adoption of automatic benchmarking methods used in their evaluation. However, while metrics and datasets abound, there are few unified benchmarking libraries that provide a framework for performing evaluations across many datasets and metrics. Furthermore, the rapid introduction of increasingly robust benchmarking methods requires that evaluation libraries remain flexible to new datasets and metrics. Finally, there remains a gap in synthesizing evaluations in order to deliver actionable takeaways about model performance. To enable unified, flexible, and actionable evaluations, we introduce EvalGIM (pronounced “EvalGym”), a library for evaluating generative image models. EvalGIM contains broad support for datasets and metrics used to measure quality, diversity, and consistency of text-to-image generative models. In addition, EvalGIM is designed with flexibility for user customization as a top priority and contains a structure that allows plug-and-play additions of new datasets and metrics. To enable actionable evaluation insights, we introduce “Evaluation Exercises” that highlight takeaways for specific evaluation questions. The Evaluation Exercises contain easy-to-use and reproducible implementations of two state-of-the-art evaluation methods of text-to-image generative models: consistency-diversity-realism Pareto Fronts and disaggregated measurements of performance disparities across groups. EvalGIM also contains Evaluation Exercises that introduce two new analysis methods for text-to-image generative models: robustness analyses of model rankings and balanced evaluations across different prompt styles. In this paper, we outline the EvalGIM library and provide guidance for how others can add new datasets, metrics, and visualizations to customize the library for their own use cases. We also demonstrate the utility of EvalGIM by using its Evaluation Exercises to explore several research questions about text-to-image generative models, such as the role of re-captioning training data or the relationship between quality and diversity in early training stages. We encourage text-to-image model exploration with EvalGIM and invite contributions at https://github.com/facebookresearch/EvalGIM/.
Written by
Abhishek Charnalia
Carolina Braga
Jakob Verbeek
Karen Ullrich
Maeve Ryan
Marton Havasi
Michal Drozdzal
Pietro Astolfi
Reyhane Askari
Tariq Berrada Ifriqi
Yohann Benchetrit
Publisher
arXiv
Research Topics
April 14, 2026
Zijian Zhou, Bohao Tang, Pengfei Liu, Fei Zhang, Frost Xu, Hang Li (BizAI), Semih Gunel, Sen He, Soubhik Sanyal, Tao Xiang, Viktar Atliha, Zhe Wang
April 14, 2026
April 09, 2026
Lei Zhang, Junjiao Tian, Kunpeng Li, Jialiang Wang, Weifeng Chen, Yuxiao Bao, Julian McAuley, Manling Li, Zecheng He, Felix Xu, Markos Georgopoulos, Zhipeng Fan
April 09, 2026
February 27, 2026
Yifu Qiu, Holger Schwenk, Paul-Ambroise Duquenne
February 27, 2026
February 11, 2026
Leon Liangyu Chen, Haoyu Ma, Ziqi Huang, Xiaoliang Dai, Jialiang Wang, Zecheng He, Jianwei Yang, Chunyuan Li, Serena Yeung-Levy, Animesh Sinha, Chu Wang, Felix Juefei-Xu, Junzhe Sun, Zhipeng Fan
February 11, 2026

Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models