July 21, 2017
When building artificial intelligence systems that can reason and answer questions about visual data, we need diagnostic tests to analyze our progress and discover shortcomings. Existing benchmarks for visual question answering can help, but have strong biases that models can exploit to correctly answer questions without reasoning. They also conflate multiple sources of error, making it hard to pinpoint model weaknesses. We present a diagnostic dataset that tests a range of visual reasoning abilities. It contains minimal biases and has detailed annotations describing the kind of reasoning each question requires. We use this dataset to analyze a variety of modern visual reasoning systems, providing novel insights into their abilities and limitations.
Publisher
April 17, 2025
Ansong Ni, Ruta Desai, Yang Li, Xinjie Lei, Dong Wang, Ramya Raghavendra, Gargi Ghosh, Daniel Li (FAIR), Asli Celikyilmaz
April 17, 2025
April 16, 2025
Paul McVay, Sergio Arnaud, Ada Martin, Arjun Majumdar, Krishna Murthy Jatavallabhula, Phillip Thomas, Ruslan Partsey, Daniel Dugas, Abha Gejji, Alexander Sax, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Mikael Henaff, Ayush Jain, Ang Cao, Ishita Prasad, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Mike Rabbat, Nicolas Ballas, Mido Assran, Oleksandr Maksymets, Aravind Rajeswaran, Franziska Meier
April 16, 2025
April 14, 2025
Yeongmin Kim, Sotiris Anagnostidis, Yuming Du, Edgar Schoenfeld, Jonas Kohler, Markos Georgopoulos, Albert Pumarola, Ali Thabet, Artsiom Sanakoyeu
April 14, 2025
March 24, 2025
Wassim (Wes) Bouaziz, Nicolas Usunier, El Mahdi El Mhamdi
March 24, 2025
April 08, 2021
Caner Hazirbas, Joanna Bitton, Brian Dolhansky, Jacqueline Pan, Albert Gordo, Cristian Canton Ferrer
April 08, 2021
April 30, 2018
Tomer Galanti, Lior Wolf, Sagie Benaim
April 30, 2018
April 30, 2018
Yedid Hoshen, Lior Wolf
April 30, 2018
December 11, 2019
Eliya Nachmani, Lior Wolf
December 11, 2019
Foundational models
Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models