July 21, 2017
When building artificial intelligence systems that can reason and answer questions about visual data, we need diagnostic tests to analyze our progress and discover shortcomings. Existing benchmarks for visual question answering can help, but have strong biases that models can exploit to correctly answer questions without reasoning. They also conflate multiple sources of error, making it hard to pinpoint model weaknesses. We present a diagnostic dataset that tests a range of visual reasoning abilities. It contains minimal biases and has detailed annotations describing the kind of reasoning each question requires. We use this dataset to analyze a variety of modern visual reasoning systems, providing novel insights into their abilities and limitations.
Publisher
November 27, 2022
Nicolas Ballas, Bernhard Schölkopf, Chris Pal, Francesco Locatello, Li Erran, Martin Weiss, Nasim Rahaman, Yoshua Bengio
November 27, 2022
November 27, 2022
Andrea Tirinzoni, Aymen Al Marjani, Emilie Kaufmann
November 27, 2022
November 16, 2022
Kushal Tirumala, Aram H. Markosyan, Armen Aghajanyan, Luke Zettlemoyer
November 16, 2022
November 10, 2022
Unnat Jain, Abhinav Gupta, Himangi Mittal, Pedro Morgado
November 10, 2022
April 08, 2021
Caner Hazirbas, Joanna Bitton, Brian Dolhansky, Jacqueline Pan, Albert Gordo, Cristian Canton Ferrer
April 08, 2021
April 30, 2018
Tomer Galanti, Lior Wolf, Sagie Benaim
April 30, 2018
April 30, 2018
Yedid Hoshen, Lior Wolf
April 30, 2018
December 11, 2019
Eliya Nachmani, Lior Wolf
December 11, 2019
Foundational models
Latest news
Foundational models