August 12, 2019
We explore the task of Canonical Surface Mapping (CSM). Specifically, given an image, we learn to map pixels on the object to their corresponding locations on an abstract 3D model of the category. But how do we learn such a mapping? A supervised approach would require extensive manual labeling which is not scalable beyond a few hand-picked categories. Our key insight is that the CSM task (pixel to 3D), when combined with 3D projection (3D to pixel), completes a cycle. Hence, we can exploit a geometric cycle consistency loss, thereby allowing us to forgo the dense manual supervision. Our approach allows us to train a CSM model for a diverse set of classes, without sparse or dense keypoint annotation, by leveraging only foreground mask labels for training. We show that our predictions also allow us to infer dense correspondence between two images, and compare the performance of our approach against several methods that predict correspondence by leveraging varying amount of supervision.
Written by
Shubham Tulsiani
Abhinav Gupta
Nilesh Kulkarni
Publisher
ICCV
April 17, 2025
Ansong Ni, Ruta Desai, Yang Li, Xinjie Lei, Dong Wang, Ramya Raghavendra, Gargi Ghosh, Daniel Li (FAIR), Asli Celikyilmaz
April 17, 2025
April 17, 2025
Paul McVay, Sergio Arnaud, Ada Martin, Arjun Majumdar, Krishna Murthy Jatavallabhula, Phillip Thomas, Ruslan Partsey, Daniel Dugas, Abha Gejji, Alexander Sax, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Mikael Henaff, Ayush Jain, Ang Cao, Ishita Prasad, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Mike Rabbat, Nicolas Ballas, Mido Assran, Oleksandr Maksymets, Aravind Rajeswaran, Franziska Meier
April 17, 2025
April 14, 2025
Yeongmin Kim, Sotiris Anagnostidis, Yuming Du, Edgar Schoenfeld, Jonas Kohler, Markos Georgopoulos, Albert Pumarola, Ali Thabet, Artsiom Sanakoyeu
April 14, 2025
March 24, 2025
Wassim (Wes) Bouaziz, Nicolas Usunier, El Mahdi El Mhamdi
March 24, 2025
Foundational models
Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models