July 18, 2021
Direct Feedback Alignment (DFA) is emerging as an efficient and biologically plausible alternative to backpropagation for training deep neural networks. Despite relying on random feedback weights for the backward pass, DFA successfully trains state-of-the-art models such as Transformers. On the other hand, it notoriously fails to train convolutional networks. An understanding of the inner workings of DFA to explain these diverging results remains elusive. Here, we propose a theory of feedback alignment algorithms. We first show that learning in shallow networks proceeds in two steps: analignment phase, where the model adapts its weights to align the approximate gradient with the true gradient of the loss function, is followed by a memorisation phase, where the model focuses on fitting the data. This two-step process has a degeneracy breaking effect: out of all the low-loss solutions in the landscape, a net-work trained with DFA naturally converges to the solution which maximises gradient alignment. We also identify a key quantity underlying alignment in deep linear networks: the conditioning of the alignment matrices. The latter enables a detailed understanding of the impact of data structure on alignment, and suggests a simple explanation for the well-known failure of DFA to train convolutional neural networks. Numerical experiments on MNIST and CIFAR10 clearly demonstrate degeneracy breaking in deep non-linear networks and show that the align-then-memorize process occurs sequentially from the bottom layers of the network to the top.
Written by
Maria Refinetti
Stephane d’Ascoli
Ruben Ohana
Sebastian Goldt
Publisher
ICML 2021
Research Topics
Core Machine Learning
May 12, 2026
Corentin Bel, Linnea Evanson, Julien Gadonneix, Andrea Santos Revilla, Mingfang (Lucy) Zhang, Julie Bonnaire, Charlotte Caucheteux, Alexandre Défossez, Théo Desbordes, Pablo Diego-Simón, Shubh Khanna, Juliette Millet, Pierre Orhan, Saarang Panchavati, Antoine Ratouchniak, Alexis Thual, Hubert Jacob Banville, Jarod Levy, Jean Remi King, Josephine Raugel, Jérémy Rapin, Katelyn Begany, Marlene Careil, Simon Dahan, Sophia Houhamdi, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Teon Brooks, Yohann Benchetrit
May 12, 2026
November 18, 2025
Roberta Raileanu, * Equal authorship, Alexis Audran-Reiss, Amar Budhiraja *, Anton Protopopov, Bhavul Gauri, Despoina Magka, Gaurav Chaurasia, Michael Slater, Shalini Maiti *, Tatiana Shavrina, Yoram Bachrach
November 18, 2025
October 13, 2025
Paria Rashidinejad, Cai Zhou, Tommi Jaakkola, DiJia Su, Bo Liu, Feiyu Chen, Chenyu Wang, Shannon Zejiang Shen, Sid Wang, Siyan Zhao, Song Jiang, Yuandong Tian
October 13, 2025
September 24, 2025
Chris Cummins, Hugh Leather, Aram Markosyan, Matteo Pagliardini, Tal Remez, Volker Seeker, Marco Selvi, Lingming Zhang, Abhishek Charnalia, Alex Gu, Badr Youbi Idrissi, Christian Keller, Daniel Haziza, David Zhang, Dmitrii Pedchenko, Emily McMilin, Fabian Gloeckle, Felix Kreuk, Francisco Massa, François Fleuret, Gabriel Synnaeve, Gal Cohen, Gallil Maimon, Jacob Kahn, Jade Copet, Jannik Kossen, Jonas Gehring, Jordi Armengol-Estape, Juliette Decugis, Keyur Muzumdar, Kunhao Zheng, Luca Wehrstedt, Maximilian Beck, Michael Hassid, Michel Meyer, Naila Murray, Oren Sultan, Ori Yoran, Pedram Bashiri, Peter O'Hearn, Pierre Chambon, Pierre-Emmanuel Mazaré, Quentin Carbonneaux, Rahul Kindi, Sida Wang, Taco Cohen, Vegard Mella, Yossi Adi, Yuxiang Wei, Zacharias Fisches
September 24, 2025
December 07, 2020
Avishek Joey Bose, Gauthier Gidel, Andre Cianflone, Pascal Vincent, Simon Lacoste-Julien, William L. Hamilton
December 07, 2020
November 03, 2020
Rui Zhang, Hanghang Tong Yinglong Xia, Yada Zhu
November 03, 2020

Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models