June 19, 2020
Measuring what linguistic information is encoded in neural models of language has become popular in NLP. Researchers approach this enterprise by training "probes"—supervised models designed to extract linguistic structure from another model's output. One such probe is the 'structural probe' (Hewitt & Manning 2019), designed to quantify the extent to which syntactic information is encoded in contextualised word representations. The structural probe has a novel design, unattested in the parsing literature, the precise benefit of which is not immediately obvious. To explore whether syntactic probes would do better to make use of existing techniques, we compare the structural probe to a more traditional parser with an identical lightweight parameterisation. The parser outperforms structural probe on UUAS in seven of nine analysed languages, often by a substantial amount (e.g. by 11.1 points in English). Under a second less common metric, however, there is the opposite trend—the structural probe outperforms the parser. This begs the question: which metric should we prefer?
Publisher
ACL
Research Topics
April 22, 2024
Vasu Sharma *, Karthik Padthe *, Newsha Ardalani, Kushal Tirumala, Russ Howes, Hu Xu, Bernie Huang, Daniel Li (FAIR), Armen Aghajanyan, Gargi Ghosh, Luke Zettlemoyer
April 22, 2024
April 14, 2024
Heng-Jui Chang, Ning Dong (AI), Ruslan Mavlyutov, Sravya Popuri, Andy Chung
April 14, 2024
April 05, 2024
Suyu Ge, Chunting Zhou, Rui Hou, Madian Khabsa, Yi-Chia Wang, Qifan Wang, Jiawei Han, Yuning Mao
April 05, 2024
February 21, 2024
Tom Sander, Pierre Fernandez, Alain Durmus, Matthijs Douze, Teddy Furon
February 21, 2024
Product experiences
Foundational models
Product experiences
Latest news
Foundational models