A Metric Learning Reality Check

August 18, 2020

Abstract

Abstract. Deep metric learning papers from the past four years have consistently claimed great advances in accuracy, often more than doubling the performance of decade-old methods. In this paper, we take a closer look at the field to see if this is actually true. We find flaws in the experimental methodology of numerous metric learning papers, and show that the actual improvements over time have been marginal at best. Code is available at github.com/KevinMusgrave/powerful-benchmarker.

Download the Paper

AUTHORS

Written by

Ser-Nam Lim

Publisher

ECCV

Research Topics

Computer Vision

Related Publications

June 11, 2025

ROBOTICS

COMPUTER VISION

CausalVQA: A Physically Grounded Causal Reasoning Benchmark for Video Models

Aaron Foss, Chloe Evans, Sasha Mitts, Koustuv Sinha, Ammar Rizvi, Justine T. Kao

June 11, 2025

Read the Paper

June 11, 2025

RESEARCH

COMPUTER VISION

IntPhys 2: Benchmarking Intuitive Physics Understanding In Complex Synthetic Environments

Florian Bordes, Quentin Garrido, Justine Kao, Adina Williams, Mike Rabbat, Emmanuel Dupoux

June 11, 2025

Read the Paper

June 11, 2025

RESEARCH

COMPUTER VISION

A Shortcut-aware Video-QA Benchmark for Physical Understanding via Minimal Video Pairs

Benno Krojer, Mojtaba Komeili, Candace Ross, Quentin Garrido, Koustuv Sinha, Nicolas Ballas, Mido Assran

June 11, 2025

Read the Paper

June 11, 2025

ROBOTICS

RESEARCH

V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning

Mido Assran, Adrien Bardes, David Fan, Quentin Garrido, Russell Howes, Mojtaba Komeili, Matthew Muckley, Ammar Rizvi, Claire Roberts, Koustuv Sinha, Artem Zholus, Sergio Arnaud, Abha Gejji, Ada Martin, Francois Robert Hogan, Daniel Dugas, Piotr Bojanowski, Vasil Khalidov, Patrick Labatut, Francisco Massa, Marc Szafraniec, Kapil Krishnakumar, Yong Li, Xiaodong Ma, Sarath Chandar, Franziska Meier, Yann LeCun, Michael Rabbat, Nicolas Ballas